Charlie Wilson's Peace: Former Rep. Who Armed Mujahideen Calls for Withdrawal Before War in Afghanistan Becomes Another Vietnam
BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
by Meg White
Hidden away in the Scranton Times-Tribune "Arts and Living" section Tuesday was a bombshell from former Democratic Representative of Texas Charlie Wilson.
The man whose adopted mission to save Afghanistan from the Soviet incursion in the 1980s spawned the notion of "Afghan freedom fighters," a book and a Hollywood movie now says we need to get the hell out of Dodge.
In an interview with the Pennsylvania paper, Wilson said he advocates a "calculated withdrawal" of American troops from the country, "rather than lose a lot of soldiers and treasure."
On the eighth anniversary of the beginning of the war in Afghanistan and during the heated debate in Washington over whether President Obama should commit more American troops to the region, Wilson's words are incredibly significant. While many have argued recently that the war is unwinnable because Afghanistan is one of the most indomitable countries on the planet, hearing a passionate defender of the Afghan peoples' right to self-govern say we should pull out is starkly different from typical anti-war sentiment.
Wilson's reasoning is that we cannot beat the people we are fighting in Afghanistan:
"I'd rather take on a chain saw," Mr. Wilson said. "They're the world's best foot soldiers, best warriors. And they're fearless.
"They're fearless, and they've got nothing to lose. And they have a pretty serious hatred for those who try to occupy their country."
The thing is, he should know. After using his seat on the House of Representatives Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense to funnel funding through the CIA to supply Soviet-made weaponry to the mujahideen, who fought alongside Osama bin Laden among others, both the lawmaker and the country rejoiced in withdrawal of Soviet troops from the country in 1989.
But Wilson doesn't let himself or his government off the hook for their collective lack of investment in nation-building at the time. According to the article, Wilson credits the failure to set up Afghanistan with an adequate governing body as the reason for the 9/11 attacks and the past eight years of brutal fighting coalition troops have seen there:
"We (screwed) up the end game," Mr. Wilson said. "It would have been very easy and done for a minuscule amount of money. We should have done the basic things for a backward country that's trying to come out of (a war) and have a reasonable hope of economic success."
The Times-Tribune interview comes ahead of a talk Wilson is scheduled to give Thursday at the Scranton Cultural Center, as part of the Lackawanna County Library System's ongoing lecture series. Wilson, at age 76, has cut back on public appearances in recent years after a heart transplant.
BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Sorry Charlie
robertsgt40--Hey Charlie...you forgot one minor detail. 911 was an inside job. This fact alone renders your story impotent. Your just another ex-politician.
Oh no, not again?!
Wilson is mistaken when
Wilson is mistaken when he says "we" screwed up the end game. "We" dont do nation-building, we do Death&Destruction (with business opportunities in all directions). When a country is not behaving, "we" call them de-stablizing. And then at our convenience, "we" go in and de-stabilize the bejeesus out of them.
When he was running for the Ovoid, Dubya said he wasnt into nation-building and I think subsequent events have shown the absolute honesty in that statement.
However, one audaciously hopes that the "pragmatic" views of such as Wilson will carry the day and the US will withdraw as soon as possible.
Why are we there?
Training camps? Those who attacked us were trained in the U.S., at flight schools right here in the south. Al Qaeda? Estimates of the massive Al Qaeda force in Afganistan? Approximately 100. Total. 100 Al Qaeda extremist terrorists in Afganistan. So why are we there? The religious fanatics called the taliban? What about the religious fanatics called the fundamentalist Christians? The ones blowing up abortion clinics, federal buildings, killing doctors...
The Taliban will negotiate
The Taliban will negotiate the surrender of Al Qaida leaders and co-operation on Al Qaida - they would have back in 2001 if Bush hadn't been in there.