Obama Clarifies Public Option Position at Healthcare Forum
BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
by Meg White
At a healthcare forum hosted by Organizing for America, the DNC's iteration of Obama's campaign team as transformed into a policy support
outreach center, President Obama assured progressives that the public option is not dead.
"This is an example of a controversy that has been manufactured this week," Obama said Thursday in response to a question from a leader of Durham For Obama, a volunteer group in North Carolina. "I continue to support a public option; I think it is important."
Obama went on to explain that opponents of healthcare reform are using the public option to scare and confuse people, hinting that that's why he (as well as some in his administration) has been reluctant to emphasize it.
"If all we're talking about is the public option, [those who already have health insurance] say to themselves, 'What's in it for me?'" he said. "That's what those who are opposed to reform are counting upon... to use that to cloud the fact that right now, people are not getting a good deal on their insurance."
Obama branded the public option as part of a "belt-and-suspenders concept," in which reforms that require insurance companies to meet basic criteria -- such as insuring all regardless of preexisting conditions -- are the "belt," and the public option is the "suspenders," ensuring compliance by way of competition.
When asked about cultivating healthy habits, Obama mentioned the garden First Lady Michelle Obama installed at the White House and said they're looking into creating a farmer's market "just outside the White House," joking that he didn't want shoppers "just tromping around" the White House lawn.
BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
For more on the OFA Forum, read Christine Bowman's analysis of the event here.
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version

Choice between hope and manipulated fear
1. War, as opposed to democracy, breeds corruption & decay.
As history proves, war, as opposed to democracy, breeds corruption & decay. As one critical example, medical fraud, abuse is estimated to reach $600 to $6000 billion over the next decade lost to it.
Please visit http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=111967435, you will be stunned ! Thankfully, in May 2009, the Obama administration announced a new task force made up of officials from the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services to work on health care fraud.
In another instance, as common sense goes, fire needs to prevent ahead, or contain in earlier phase, nevertheless, from what I've learned, the special interests have hindered the budget request for preventive care program in Medicare & Medicaid so far, which has resulted in health Catrina, exceedingly high level of chronic disease and expense, and astronomical cost of overall health care compared to any other nation, as data shows.
There is no doubt that in ordinary time, investments in a fire safety system do not go into economic effect, but due to the lack of it, once preventable fire breaks out, it overwhelms the narrow calculation, and even goes beyond monetary value. As the swine flu pandemic shows, investment in vaccine could bring about tens, hundreds, even thousands of economic effects in a short period. Thereby, in an effort to prevent another health Catrina, coordinated, systematic non-profit efforts for preventive care, more primary doctors are of critical importance. Probably that also explains why the successful systems in all free nations are committed to public policy.
2. The savings via removing wastes turn into limit to medical access, rationing, tax raise, and deficit etc via lies.
Unlike high fuel price and mortgage rate in recent years as the roots of great recession and bankruptcy of middle class, the severity in the high cost of health premiums has come to light lately. Similarly, in an attempt to hide these painful corruptions & wastes, the greed allies struggle to connect the savings via removing these wastes with limit to medical access, rationing, tax raise, and deficit etc. But, hope should not be replaced with fear, just like people don't have to fear quitting drug.
3. Hope for pioneer spirit, innovation.
Interestingly enough, pioneers like Ted Kennedy are changing the world somewhere in the U.S. Recently, GM has surprised the world with the adoption of EV-conversion technology from pioneers and outpaced the excellent hybrid cars.
And in spite of the highest annual health plan cost per employee, the revolutionary mandatory-coverage plan in Massachusetts was enacted in 2006 and more than 97% of all Massachusetts residents are now covered -- whereas nationally some 40% of Americans have no health insurance.
Even if the state is suffering financially due to the highest premiums, without the affordable public option and removing all kinds of wastes etc, it achieved near universal health program.
Today, another innovative, fundamental change in payment system, or patient's outcome based payment reform that is able to turn the profit-oriented malpractices and volume into the patient-oriented value and quality is waiting for a final decision.
4. Enough room for savings.
Many reformers recognized roughly 30 percent of all health-care spending in the U.S. -some $700 billion a year- might be wasted on medical abuse, unnecessary procedures, unnecessary visits to the doctor, overpriced pharmaceuticals, bloated insurance companies, and the most inefficient paper billing systems imaginable, and payment reform could solve this problem.
Provided the American people pay around twice the amount of the efficient systems, the result is still well below them, the ratio of waste might be estimated to reach far more than 50% in the U.S.
Let's be conservative regarding the ratio. Even If as little as 10% of savings such as removing the wastes involving medical fraud, so called "doughnut hole" , the unnecessary subsidies for insurers, exorbitant costs by the tragic ER visits etc apply to the combined Medicare and Medicaid cost of $923.5bn per year, as of July, the savings of $923.5bn over the next decade are possible. And when these savings add to the already allocated $583 billion, the concern over revenue might be a thing of the past.
As a matter of fact, some patient-focused clinics in 10 regions have already achieved 16% of savings in Medicare while their quality scores are well above average, with the more expansive, systematic reform than them in the pipeline. Aside from the already allocated $583 billion and the savings of this reform package, 16% of $923.5bn (the combined Medicare and Medicaid cost per year) is around $147.76bn per year and 1477.6bn over the next decade, enough to meet the goal.
Please be 'sure' to visit http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/13/opinion/13gawande.html?hp for credible evidences !
Dr. Armadio at Mayo clinic says, "If we got rid of that stuff (waste), we save a third of all that we spend and that is 2.5 trillion dollars on health care. A third of that and that is 700 billion dollars a year. That covers a lot of uninsured people."
Please visit http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=820455&catid=391 for detailed infos
5. Choice between hope and manipulated fear.
To be sure, time does not fix the endless greed, energy depletion. Considering the current fuel price is hovering around $60 to $70 per barrel in this economy, supposedly it might be equivalent to the peak price last year while the similar runaway premiums keep on rising, heading for financial ruin. And it is firmly believed if people fail to build a bridge for the next generations, the current generation, too, can not avoid falling off the cliff, as the world-wide overpopulation & immense consumption in conventional energy and the other resources no longer allows waste.
As usual, when the positive effects including job creation and savings generated by investments are left out of the equation, fear and scare are left alone. Today choice between hope and manipulated fear lies with people's will.
Thank You !
"It's not dead"?
Pheeewwww! I feel so much better, now.
The good news is that the Whitehouse has finally decided to draw a line in the sand on health care reform. Of course, it's not the line we were looking for. The Whitehouse has insisted that any plan must not raise taxes on anyone earning less than $250,000, but has steadfastly refused to insist that public option is a requirement. But hey, ......
... at least they said the public option is not dead.
wow...
Ms. White - THANKS FOR THE SANITY
All the stupid, suicidal Progressive Scapegoating must end. This type of constructive piece will help. Thank you. We need to top Scapegoating and RE-START ORGANIZING. NOW!!!! http://barackobama.com (OFA) and http://moveon.org ; or folks should just shut up and get out of the way.
Start Loving - Oh, You Mean Like The One Right Above You?
NOBODY dares question their brand of suicidal Progressive Scapegoating - er, "Purity", as shown by their constant embrace of Racist Ralphie and Dennis Kuchinich.
Kuchinich is a fine Progressive Congressman, but stands less chance of being elected President than YMan, Mike5000, epppie or Nasrudin do. Nonetheless, they keep drinking the Dennis and Ralph flavored Kool-Aid, election after election....
Jesus, "Doc" .....
You're still defending Obama? Okay, ..... I understand you think Ralph Nader suddenly went racist on you after all those years you supported him, voted for him, worked for him (didn't you even eat with him?), but what do you have against Kucinich? Certainly it's not because you think he's not progressive enough, right? Is it just because you think he's less electable?
See, this is where you get funny, "Doc" ..... seriously funny. You go from conservative to libertarian to progressive Democrat. You support candidate after candidate (Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Ralph Nader, etc.) who you later claim are "Rethug-lite, Khrister-right, racist, DINO, blah, blah, blah ...". You campaigned and voted for third party candidates who had zero chance of being elected, then ridicule those who do the same thing. You sold Obama as the progressive candidate during last year's election, accusing anyone who didn't support him of doing so because they were a "Racist!".
So let me ask ya, "Doc" ...... particularly since you've disappeared after the inauguration....
How's that whole Hopey Changey thing workin' out for ya?
(Heh, heh, heh) ....
Dead Souls
Hey-ho Yman-
It must be a terribly crushing burden to see the world clearly for what it is while all those around you wear rose-colored glasses. I feel for you brother...what a heavy load you've got to carry. But all things considered, that "whole Hopey-Changey thing" was the best counter-proposal to continuing the rolling disaster of the previous 8 yrs. Would you have preferred Geezer & the Dingbat instead? Lay off the corrosive cynicism and try a bit of civil discourse for a change of diet. There is ignorance and darkness everywhere and the only antidote is a tall cool glass of reality-based thinking. Give 'em the facts, call no one an eejit, and try a little humility every day.
And by the way, that whole Hopey-Changey thing is doing pretty well. (Heh, heh, heh) ....
Grisha
To be factual, it's not
To be factual, it's not everyone who wears (or wore rose-colored glasses. Just a few of the true progs (like "Doc") who sold Obama as a progressive candidate with the "character", "strength" and "integrity" to lead a progressive agenda, while accusing anyone who didn't support Obama of being a racist. Most have disappeared in embarrassment over the past 8 months, but a few (like "Doc") apparently have a bit of a masochistic streak. What can I say? It's just fun to rub their noses it it.
The "Hopey-Changey thing is doing pretty well"? You mean compared to Bush or McCain? wow. Kinda like being told you're getting a shiny, new sports car, but when you find out it's an '87 Chevette, you say, "Well, it's better than the '84 Yugo we could have ended up with." Looking on the bright side is nice, but maaaaan .... do we really need to go through the laundry list of progressive betrayals by Obama?
"Doing pretty well"? Apparently not.
BTW - I do like the sincere plea for "civil discourse" and demand to "lay off the corrosive cynicism", sandwiched right after the sarcastic introduction and the "Geezer and Dingbat" comment. So, "call no one an eejit", .........
.... but "Geezer and Dingbat" is fine.
Got it.
Still pompously pointing fingers?
Yman,
Just remember, every time you point your holier than thou finger at someone, three fingers including your middle finger are pointing back at Y-O-U!
WE THE PEOPLE need to come together and fight the upper 1% plutocracy who master at dividing and conquering us so their K street lobbyists can once again bribe our Congress into voting against our best wishes.
Apparently, you don't like what Obama is doing any more than the rest of us, so either get with the program and help us change his ways, or get out of the way and STFU!!!
Sorry, Kevin, ...
... it's just too much fun.
"... get with the program and help us change his ways, or get out of the way and STFU!!!"
Sure, Kevvy, ...... but only because you asked so nicely. :)
A Sliver?
That's what our president said the public option health insurance was less than a week ago. As FDR is supposed to have said, "Make me do it." There will be a corporate-organized and funded "grassroots" march on Washington on September 12th. These people are using the "big government, higher taxes" frame like a sledge hammer. A man on my doorstep pulled that one just today about a local election. In the face of his pushy persistence, I slammed the door. This is insane.
"Make me do it." And we are NOT.
But there is still time. ORGANIZE! http://barackobama.com
a new leadership style?
Is it a new leadership style to show no visible leadership? Does that work?
rjf7r, you define "Leadership": Progressive Bush/Cheney?
No thanks.
I define leadership: Preparation, knowledge, courageously leaping into the fray, taking on all commers, courageous respectful dialog, embrace of ALL constituents, vision, inflexibility on the goals and total flexibility on the objectives.
I define leadership: PRES. BARACK OBAMA
Remaining the same is leadership???
Is that you Rahm? After reading your comment, you appear to be getting propaganda lessons from Rove.
ok
ART of the Possible
SpikeHeels-
I sincerely doubt that Mr. Obama is "getting confused". However, if his nuanced stance on an issue has become a joke in your office and you've not done anything to understand what is behind what seems to be a redefined position then you're perhaps not ready to engage in an honest political debate. Politics is messy sausage-making, and re-assessing a position is something one does as context changes. No one seriously believes that legislation comes ready-made out of a box...it is an endless progression of compromising, back-scratching, log-rolling, back-slapping, and finally sitting over a table with sleeves or apron rolled up and getting down to making something that most people will eat.
Grisha
SpikeHeels: Hmm. One of us is getting Twisted by YouTube?
I mean, Pres. Obama has been consistant and passionate about the Public option in Montana, Colorado, and today in DC on the Organizing for America Teleconference. It is all online. It is all at http://YouTube.com/StartLoving1 . You do want the facts, right? You don't just want to Scapegoat and Crucify Pres. Obama in error. Right? The soul of America and and Health of millions is at stake, and requires us to responsible, constructive and working CONSTRUCTIVELY like hell, right?