Plenty of room in health care battle for Tom Daschle and Howard Dean
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
by Chad Rubel
Steve Martin had this great routine about how you could be a millionaire and never pay taxes. First you had to get a million dollars. Then when the IRS comes to your door and asks why you've never paid taxes, you say two simple words in the English language: "I forgot."
Seems to be a bit of that going around lately. Tim Geithner had his problems, but did get confirmed. Now Tom Daschle is running into his own problems. (And Nancy Killefer, who failed to pay some employment taxes on household help, has withdrawn her candidacy to be the first chief performance officer.)
To be fair to Daschle, he has paid the taxes back with penalty. In fact, he may have overpaid this time around. But there is still this anger against Cabinet nominees over not properly paying taxes. (Why people are angrier at Daschle than Bernie Madoff or some overpaid Wall Street guy is a topic for another essay.)
But when The New York Times and "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" are both angry about this tax issue, judgment needs to step in.
One issue for progressives is that they see someone waiting on the sidelines, ready to take Daschle's place at HHS: Howard Dean. President Obama could have picked Dean, but felt Daschle was a better pick for getting potential health care legislation through Congress. If the tax scenario eats up Daschle, everyone may get their wish. Progressives could get Dean and Daschle could still be a point person for the legislation since, as an advisor, he wouldn't need to be confirmed by the Senate.
As we have seen in this country, we have a boatload of health issues to wrestle. So it's good to have a point person for getting us closer to decent health care. But we also need someone to handle the rest of the health issues. And Howard Dean would be perfect for that role.
And President Obama has an escape hatch, having already named Daschle to be director of a new White House Office of Health Reform, a job that does not need Senate confirmation.
Given the prerogative, the president should have the person best suited for that post. But in the end, there is plenty of room and loads of problems for Tom Daschle and Howard Dean to both be a part of the process.
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Daschle & Dean
The progressive community has shot itself in the foot on this on
Moderate Dems have learned well from 'W' the Diverter/Divider
I'm with you on how the media AND I add those insider Dems - those that wrote the pro-banking legislation, can keep the subject off themselves and they're own wrongs, while throwing others with more minor errors out to distract the wolves while they continue to get away with financial murder.
Daschle and Kennedy would have been great for the Progressives. Keep in mind Daschle lost his seat by NOT playing the submissive ML, as Reid now pathetically does.
Dean has been deliberately kept out - at Emanuel and Clintons request I believe, for being staunchly loyal to the Progressive side of the party AS well as being a generally honest guy.
As a once loyal Obama fan, I see this new alliance with so many of those who destroyed the country and the Party not as a move for bi-partisanship - AT ALL, BUT AS A MOVE BY A MAN DETERMINED TO GET DONE WHAT HE CAN - WHILE SLEEPING WITH THE ENEMY.
Which is already resulting in his losing his entire base - something he, Emanuel and Clinton have long thought they could make up by attracting replacements from the Right.
That strategery ain't working out too well, is it?
But in a nutshell folkes, THAT is the very substance of your "new and improved" 45th model of a President.
A Recycled Party Presidency as created by the wet and slimy hands and minds of those of the DLC wing of American politics.
And all I can say now is "EWWWWWW!"
Nationalism is not terrorism. And an adversary is not an enemy.
Emanuel and Clinton
We Need a Cure for Health Care in Tennessee and Virginia