Into the cuckoo's nest: Fighting against Obama's natural-born U.S. citizenship
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
by Chad Rubel
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. This seems to be the mantra of those trying to prove that Barack Obama is not a natural-born citizen, and therefore ineligible to be president.
The Supreme Court refused to hear an emergency appeal today. The argument from a New Jersey man claims Obama is ineligible because he was a British subject at birth. Kenya, homeland of his father, was under British rule in 1961, the year Obama was born.
Then there is the argument from a Pennsylvania man that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawai'i.
But hey, if you don't like this argument: try the strategy of Dr. Orly Taitz DDS Esq. She is claiming before the California Supreme Court that the state can't certify the results because Obama was a British citizen at his birth.
By going through the California courts and other courts, Pastor Wiley Drake, who is part of a crusade to prove Obama isn't a natural-born citizen, says the hope is to whittle down the number of electoral votes for Obama to less than 270. If that were to possibly happen, the U.S. House would then get to vote for president, and would likely elect Obama anyway.
Dr. Taitz quotes from John A. Bingham, framer of the 14th Amendment, and his definition of "natural-born citizen." But the 14th Amendment doesn't deal with natural-born citizens nor does his opinion reflect the law of this country.
The other major "evidence" is the Perkins vs. Elg decision from 1939. That case involved a woman who was born in the United States to an American mother and a Swedish father. The woman came back after reaching the age of majority to claim U.S. citizenship.
The problem with using this case is that it deals with citizenry, not natural-born citizenry, and that unlike the Elg woman, Obama came back at the age of 10, still a minor, and has lived in the United States ever since. Oh, and the fact that the Supreme Court ruled Elg was a natural-born citizen.
Drake says his interest has nothing to do with politics or race, but because "we live in a Constitutional Republic not a democracy."
While the issue of what constitutes a natural-born citizen is a true debate, dual citizens at birth haven't previously been part of the discussion. By that logic, Bill Richardson wouldn't be natural-born. Richardson tells the story of his American father driving his Mexican mother to give birth to make sure his child was a natural-born citizen. There certainly was that expectation in 1947.
George Romney, who ran for president in 1968, was born in Mexico to two U.S. parents. Romney didn't live in the United States until he was 32.
Then there is the Chester A. Arthur story. There were objections during his vice-presidential run that Arthur was born in Canada, and therefore not eligible. He was born to one U.S. citizen parent and a naturalized U.S. citizen from Ireland -- in Vermont or Quebec, depending on whom you believe.
To be fair, Drake notes, John McCain isn't considered to be a natural-born citizen either. And Roger Calero, the Socialist Workers candidate, as well. Though it isn't clear that they made anywhere near the effort against McCain as they have against Obama.
The John McCain issue is a bit more simple. Born to U.S. parents but outside the confines of the United States, McCain's status came under concern, but was generally given a pass. The Senate passed a non-binding resolution saying McCain was okay to run.
Those who are fighting against Obama are trying several different takes, and throwing out allegations that, even if true, don't pertain to his status as an U.S. citizen or natural-born citizen status.
The fact that none of the Democratic presidential candidates, none of the Republican presidential candidates, the Republican National Committee, and the MSM, including FOX News, have discovered any evidence to back them up is probably a sign that there isn't much to this.
The sad part is that if these groups don't get their way, and don't get the results overturned, they will feel like Obama isn't their president, and try to cause unrest during his time in office. After we have legitimately had a squatter in the White House, it is insulting for right-wing extremists to twist and slant reality to call out their own "squatter."
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
Also see: http://mediaputz.com/08/12/putz1204.html for more information on the nut jobs behind this pathological crusade, and the now-bankrupt Chicago Tribune's bizarre acceptance of a full page ad from them followed by a Tribune news story debunking the entire crazed effort to overturn an election.
Additional BuzzFlash note: Some of the information in this commentary is gathered from a media conference call organized by the lead participants in the effort to deny Obama the presidency -- and who for some reason sent BuzzFlash an e-mail invitation to participate in. The call was held at 11 Central Time on Monday, December 8.
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
One phrase
Wingnuts seeking documents; Lawyers seeking rulings
Don't Believe the Right-Wing Liars. It's ALL About Race
Lets face it folks, the
Excellent Coverage, Chad
Construing Citizenry
What a Wonderful Story
"Navy Brat" :-)
Thank you:-) Hello----Navy past too
They rushed my father's class of '46 at Annapolis to graduate early so they could hurry up and "join the war". Even so, it was over by then, and in the last couple days before the end was declared, his brother, who had come all the way through the war, was killed in a train wreck on Okinawa.
................................................................
Another of my brothers, tho' Dean's list the year before at FSU, had taken off and spent the summer off on fishing boats out of Panama City, FL and wended his way into Texas. In PC there was such a high enlistment rate that not many boys were drafted, and besides, he was just out adventuring, anyway. Our mother hired someone to trace him, then threatened to turn him in to the draft board for not informing them of where he was if he did not "come home" immediately. Meantime, home had moved to St.Pete & retirement. My brother showed up, but was rather disgusted by the whole impirical Mother/Child scenario so after a while of keeping a whiskey bottle at my apt. and stopping by to swish some about in his mouth before going "home" where mother would be waiting at the door, smelling his breath with a tea-totallers nose:-)--> He enlisted in the AF then, was sent to SanFran area and the language school, where he excelled. He had free time for weekends during 1966 Height/Ashbury timing...., (Such a "mixed bag" of timing!) (He still speaks VN.)
After being sent to VN and there to wind up operating a camera (w/no flight pay), shooting pictures of agent oranged jungle and such from the air instead of interpreting, he quit the war and wound up painting barracks on Okinawa with others who had "quit the war"........ which kept them out of sight, and kept their growing #s unreported. .................... ................
...................................................................
>>Apparently, our soldiers and the war protesters were all too expendable in the quest for money and power.<<......................
And here we are again, proving the maxim of insanity as if glued to us, going 'round on that yet again, just the same as the other times before.
Repeating the same type obfuscated action with its like accompaniment of general talking points rationale, while expecting different results, this time, each time, tho' every time is always more of the same as before.
........................................................................................
When will they ever learn,
When, will, they, ehhhhhhver, learn????? ........
(-:G
http://www.zianet.com/XLexcel/OHBOY.html
MAKE--WAR--OBSOLETE
Laughter or Despair
the lunatic right
Isn't Alan Keyes Trying To Prove This, Too?
At least nobody can accuse Alan Keyes of the last, that's for sure! :D
Yeah ...
Because there are sooooooo many "pure progressives" who are secretly racists.
No need to project your white guilt among everyone else, just because you have a bunch of racists among your screwed up relatives.
Speaking of "pure progressive" Racist Ralphie-luvvin' Trolls...
You can go now....
Leave the shotgun - you're not mature enough to use it intelligently, anyway.
"Ralphie-luvvin' troll"?
Oh wait .......
That was you, wasn't it?
I have to admit that your "white guilt" complex is pretty funny, though .... makes you sound like a white version of Kumar. "What are you a racist?!?!".
Birth certificates
Aren't birth certificates public records?
Can't you just pay a fee and get a copy of the basic public record - not
the health information, just the date and place of birth and mother's name
and sometimes father's?
Has Buzzflash not tried this?
Why is there even room for speculation and paranoia?
Of course, those who "know" that Obama was born in Kenya or Indonesia
(that one is really ridiculous because his mother hadn't yet met the Indonesian
man she later married) won't be deterred, much less reassured, by real information.
But it would seem to be pretty easy to squelch the basis for the rumors and leave
the crazies to be crazy off the public screen.
Colleen Clark
Cambridge, MA
not any more
Constitutional Eligibility Became Moot on Election Day
The idea that WE THE PEOPLE are the sovereignty and supreme governing authority in the U.S. has escaped both pro and anti Obama camps.
The notion of Obama not being qualified to be president arose during the primaries and was rejected by the Democrats because they choose him to be the Democratic Nominee. The notion was again rejected by WE THE PEOPLE on election day when he became the undisputed President Elect.
At this point, only WE THE PEOPLE, collectively, can change the outcome of the recent presidential election. After the election, any argument concerning his eligibility, including his place of birth, is moot.
This is a highly significant point because I suspect in the very near future, a bogus birth certificate may originate from Kenya. But even if a Kenyan birth certificate were found to be real, it would not change the outcome of the presidential election. WE THE PEOPLE have spoken and WE chose Obama to be our 44th President.
'This country is owned by We the People. We created the Constitution to limit and shape the powers of government. We can, in point of fact, knowingly elect a felon to the House or Senate and prior US Supreme Court precedents like Powell v. McCormack uphold the inability of the House or Senate to remove the people's choice for any reason other than the qualifications clauses in the Constitution, which are minimal.
In turn, at least six US Senators and Representatives have served full terms even though elected when they were TOO young under the constitution.
Do We the People, the sovereign power of this country, have the power to resolve conflicting claims on a birth certificate where one side claims Kenyan birth and ratify that or assume the risks of that?
Puh-leeze. Of course We Can. And yeah, we can ignore discriminatory claims about kenyan birth that, even if true, just don't matter.
Can the Courts or Congress, on a basis completely independent of the will of the people, second-guess the election, tell us to "try again", or veto our choices?
No They Can't.
...the American people would never lose a struggle for democracy on their own country -- IF they understood it as such. So, of course, this direct attack (seeking to re-decide or overrule the election of Obama) is styled as "upholding the Constitution." In effect, our own national hunger for the restoration of justice, the rule of law and the Constitution is being harnessed -- in a twisted way -- so that the Constitution can start being enforced FIRST against Barack Obama. That's why it's important to see these lawsuits for what they are -- and go on offense against those who dislike democracy.
WE SHOULDN'T EVEN GO TO THE "MERITS" ON THESE CASES BECAUSE NOTHING IN THE NATURE OF WHAT THEY SPEAK OF JUSTIFIES A JUDICIAL OR CONGRESSIONAL OVERRIDE (OR RATIFICATION) OF THE PEOPLE'S DECISION.
We don't need their "help."'
http://tinyurl.com/5lbtsp
In other words, WE THE PEOPLE have decided that Barack Obama, American Citizen or not, will be our 44th president. Our decision cannot be overridden by Congress, the Supreme Court or even the Constitution.
WE THE PEOPLE are the sovereignty and hold supreme legal and legislative authority over the U.S. Our sovereignty supersedes the combined powers of our three branch federal government and the U.S. Constitution.
The U.S. Constitution was written to limit the powers of our government. It was not written to limit the powers of WE THE PEOPLE.
WE THE PEOPLE can indeed elect anyone we want to be president, regardless of what the Constitution says, and there is nothing anyone or any law can do to stop us.
Barack Obama is indeed the President Elect.
END OF STORY!
WeThePeople
Kevin, Thank You
Let the Dubya/dick Investigations Begin!
It is well documented that dick Cheney made sure the intelligence was faulty.
Indictments flow uphill. Dubya may preemptively pardon everyone under the sun. But that act of cowardice will not protect evil corporations like Halliburton and Blackwater from prosecution and it will not protect the trillions of dollars they stole from being confiscated, even if the money is hidden away in Dubai.
Constitutional Eligibility Became Moot on Election Day
Quote away!
What a waste of time!!