Get FREE BuzzFlash News Alerts

Email:  

Is the right-wing government also about to fall in Canada?

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
by Chad Rubel

Right this second, Stephen Harper remains Prime Minister of Canada. Harper got Governor General Michaëlle Jean to suspend Parliament until January 26. If the suspension hadn't gone through, the other three major parties would have forced a no confidence vote on Monday, dissolving the government less than two months after the last federal election. (The Governor General is the Queen of England's representative and de facto head of state. Jean could have decided not to suspend Parliament.)

As the headline on today's column from The Globe & Mail's Jeffrey Simpson puts it, "What a difference five days make."

So what brought all of this on? Lots of things, but the way Harper has handled the economy and budget has a lot to do with it. But there is this underlying concern about giving Harper a majority government. This is the third consecutive Conservative government, all minority, and the fourth minority government in a row -- all previously unheard of marks in Canadian history.

Harper actually won more seats in another minority government on October 14, increasing his total from 124 seats from the last election to 143 of a possible 308 seats (155 means a majority). The Liberals and the New Democratic Party combined only hold 114 seats, so the Bloc Quebecois, a separatist party, would have to be involved.

In the last election cycle, Liberal Party leader Stephane Dion was asked whether he would form a coalition government with the NDP, and he flatly said no. Now, there may be the strangest coalition -- including the separatist Bloc Quebecois -- with Dion in charge.  

What is all the more confusing, besides the fact that there has never been a coup on this level in Canadian history, is that Dion is still stepping down as party leader (and possibly Prime Minister) when the party elects a new leader in the spring.  

The delay gives Harper time to come up with a budget that might put off a no confidence vote. But the lack of strong leadership from the two strongest parties in Canada is the primary reason for this scenario. The suspension of Parliament is rather unprecedented, and it might give Harper the breathing room he needs.

But there is a leadership vacuum. The Liberal Party would love to have seen this happen just after picking a new leader, likely coming down to two Toronto MPs -- former Ontario premier Bob Rae (while with the NDP) and former Harvard professor Michael Ignatieff -- along with MP Dominic LeBlanc from New Brunswick.

The coalition government, if they get a shot in late January, can hold together for a few months until Dion passes the torch. Uniting against Stephen Harper may be easier than it would seem. But underestimating Harper is a mistake. This battle will rage on for quite awhile, regardless of what happens in late January. While Harper will be the Prime Minister when Barack Obama takes the oath of office, the question will be for how long.

History of Canadian minority governments

A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT


George W Bush Is Jealous!

Just remember - this same power was used to topple the Australian government in 1975, and almost brought them to reject any continued interference in their internal affairs by the Queen of England. They wimped out, so it could happen to them again.

If it were possible for Bush to have appealed to a "higher power" like a Queen's Representative to throw out the rule of law for a rule by diktat, he wouldn't have bought real estate in Dallas and Paraguay. He would be too busy fighting the fifty wars he started to enrich his contributors through international plunder to even think of retiring.

Let's Be Careful Here...

Let's not call the proposed coalition a "coup". That's a word being used on right-wing talk radio to delegitimize what is a perfectly legal and proper state of affairs in a multi-party, parliamentary democracy. It just hasn't happened before here in Canada. It has to be pointed out that 64 percent of the members of Parliament were elected from left or center-left parties (at least with regards to economic policy). Harper acted like emperor Nero while the economic crisis loomed in the States, and then pushed Canada into a recession -- a circumstance that was forseeable by anybody but a doctrinaire neo-con. The last straw came a week ago when the Finanace minister tabled a "budget preview" which was a piece of partisan gamesmenship right out of Karl Rove's playbook. It sought to deprive the labor rights of federal employees and end pay equity for women under the guise of "cost cutting" -- a transparent and insulting move that was an affront to all who were concerned about the government's response to the economic crisis. Harper and his minority conservatives have been literally allowed to govern for the last two years as long as they could get enough members from the other parties to go along with their legislative programs, but this "budget preview" was just the kind of right-wing extremist bullcrap that pregressive Canadians had feared all along, and it allowed the 64 percent of non-conservatives in the House to put aside their differences, coalesce, and threaten a non-confidence vote.

The coup has just taken place, but it isn't what the writer

envisaged. Mr. Harper has just engineered the coup: If parliament doesn't support you, well, dissolve parliament and govern without it. Of course, there are precedents for this: Adolf Hitler did it. So did Mussolini. There are a number of other countries that had similar 'figurehead' parliaments: Spain under Franco, the USSR under the communist party, Communist China... well, quite a few, actually. Just not Canadian precedents.

Is Harper about to fall?

I listened to a Vancouver Sun reporter on Wednesday explain the whole thing: The Conservatives decided to eliminate, for the Liberals, their capacity to draw on national funds for their elections. In Canada, the Liberals depend on national funds far more so than do the Conservatives. Therefore, the LIberals were effectively eliminated from having any chance to compete in further elections. It was a simple move on the part of the Conservatives to eliminate their competition. Trouble is: the whole Canadian Country was expecting Harper to announce what he would do to help Canada through this wordwide financial situation. Instead, he announced how he was going to preserve his own power and get rid of all dissenting voices. THIS is why all these former enemies have come together in a coalition. Anyone who is interested: I suggest you listen to Vaughn Palmer of the Vancouver Sun who knows exactly what is going on.

Fall of Canadian Government

In this article, Mr. Rubel states "What is all the more confusing, besides the fact that there has never been a coup on this level in Canadian history....." If the coalition of two parties holds together with support from a third, it will be a legitimate, orderly way for the government to be formed. It would not be a coup. If, as in this case, the Prime Minister does not have the confidence of a majority of Members of Parliament, it is the responsibility of the Governor General to select a new Prime Minister from the existing Members of Parliament. Whomever she selects must have the confidence of a majority of the house. I repeat, this is not a coup. It is orderly, legitimate and it follows the constitution to the letter. No one's vote is erased, no one's rights are violated. D. Roberts, Thunder Bay, ON

Technically not a coup

It's not a literal coup, this is true. But it would be an adjustment in power without a direct election. Some may object to this, others won't. But the situation is unusual, needless to say.

not a coup by any stretch

It may be historically unusual for Canada, but it's hardly unusual in parliamentary governments. Frankly it seems much more democratic to have a majority coalition in control than a minority government. There is no need for another election to adjust power if there is confidence in a majority of those already elected, which is the case here.

shouldn't have an election

I agree that there doesn't need to be another election. I was only passing along the concerns of others. Again, it's unusual within North America.