Hillary Clinton: Economic Meltdown Is 'A Total Loss of Trust'
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
by Christine Bowman
"What this crisis is at bottom is a total loss of trust," Senator Hillary Clinton told Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski on the MSNBC Morning Joe show Tuesday. "People don't believe what they are being told, Americans have no reason to believe either their government or the Wall Street banks, banks don't believe each other, they don't know how to value the assets that they hold or that they've sold, so we need to take a deep breath here. And I think that' s what secretary Paulson was trying to do."
"But there has to be some checks and balances. We can't just turn over $700 billion. We need to have an ability to rewrite these mortgages, we need to begin to rein in the excesses on Wall Street and in the marketplace, and we need to do it in a way that will get our economy up and moving again."
Senator Clinton endorsed the idea of "trying to stay in the center, be pragmatic, come up with solutions that work."
Citing the success of FDR's administration in the 1930s as a model, she said America once again requires solutions that can create a framework that addresses both conservative and progressive concerns.
"We established back in the 1930s under incredibly severe economic conditions the framework for regulation that frankly made our market the envy of the world because we had regulation, but we didn't in any way constrain the marketplace, so we had unprecedented growth for all of those decades."
"Well, we're in a new global economy now and we haven't kept up with what is needed for a regulatory framework to try to make sure we rein in the excesses and the abuses."
"Human nature being what it is, people are going to test the limits," of any system, she indicated, which is what we have seen. "Let's get together, recognize that we need new frameworks that keep people from abusing either the public trust or the private trust."
Congress and the Bush Administration continue today to seek those solutions. Democrats, among them Senator Clinton, have proposed more oversight and safeguards for taxpayers, in response to the administration's call for a "clean" bill granting broad powers to the Secretary of the Treasury to act unilaterally to stabilize market elements.
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Trust and Compromise
Economic Meltdown = Opportunity
Let's check on who benefits!!!
Simple is as simple does
Betrayal, she says??
Hmmm.
That's from the woman who helped write the Bankruptcy bill - a really spiteful bill written by her NY donors where a Judge's right to stop evictions during the Bankruptcy proceedings was deliberately stripped out - and then knowing it would pass under the Republican controlled Senate, didn't cast the vote for it to not anger her Democratic voters.
Kind of like saying she's a Democrat and will support Obama, and then disappears, so she doesn't have to. Or pulls a Bill and appears, but has nothing supportive to say.
With support like that, I don't trust anything either of them have to say anymore.
Nationalism is not terrorism. And an adversary is not an enemy.
She didn't cast a vote for it ....
Just so there's no confusion, there were many versions of this bill, which began working their way through the Congress in 1997. In 2000, Bill Clinton pocket-vetoed the first version to pass both Houses, after Hillary had worked to kill an earlier version of the bill (speeches, op-ed pieces, discussions with members of Congress, etc.). She voted for a newer version of the bill in 2001 (one of 36 Dems favoring it), which was not enacted. Re: the 2005 bill, she voted against the bill on a procedural motion, but missed the final vote, which passed the Senate 74-25.
"Betrayal"? Missing a vote to be with your spouse when they're having heart surgery? ....... No.
"Betrayal" is more like the violation of a vital promise. Like vowing to oppose the FISA "compromise" - even filibuster it if need be - but, after winning the nomination - breaking your word and voting for it.
Now that would be a "betrayal".
You don't trust anything either of them have to say anymore?
I'm sure they're .........
.... crushed.
How could they have lost our trust?
Betrayl of Trust