Waxman Wants Answers from White House on Bush Lying About PlameGate Internal Investigation
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
From the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee
Chairman Waxman Questions White House Security Practices
Today, Chairman Waxman asked White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten to explain why the White House failed to conduct any investigation following the disclosure of Valerie Plame Wilson's covert CIA employment. The letter follows the testimony of the Director of the Office of Security at the White House, James Knodell, that the White House Security Office did not follow the investigative steps prescribed by Executive Order 12958.
Text of the Letter Follows:
March 16, 2007
The Honorable Joshua Bolten Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. Bolten:
Today, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing to examine the disclosure by senior White House officials of the identity of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson. The hearing raised many new questions about the how the White House responded to an extraordinarily serious breach of national security. It also raised new concerns about whether the security practices being followed by the White House are sufficient to protect our nation's most sensitive secrets.
James Knodell, Director of the Office of Security at the White House, testified at the hearing about White House procedures for safeguarding classified information. During his testimony, Mr. Knodell made some remarkable statements about how his office handled the disclosure of Ms. Wilson's covert status. Specifically, Mr. Knodell testified:
* The Office of Security for the White House never conducted any investigation of the disclosure of Ms. Wilson's identity;
* Under the applicable executive order and regulations, your senior political advisor, Karl Rove, and other senior White House officials were required to report what they knew about the disclosure of Ms. Wilson's identity, but they did not make any such report to the White House Office of Security; and
* There has been no suspension of security clearances or any other administrative sanction for Mr. Rove and other White House officials involved in the disclosure.
According to Mr. Knodell, the explanation for the lack of action by the White House Security Office was a White House decision not to conduct a security investigation while a criminal investigation was pending. Mr. Knodell could not explain, however, why the White House did not initiate an investigation after the security breach. It took months before a criminal investigation was initiated, yet according to Mr. Knodell, there was no White House investigation initiated during this period.
Mr. Knodell also testified that it would be inappropriate to allow an individual who was a security risk to retain his or her security clearance while a criminal investigation is pending. As members of the Committee pointed out, a criminal investigation can last years, and it would jeopardize national security not to investigate the officials implicated in the leak and suspend their security clearances if there were reason to suspect their involvement. Mr. Knodell did not dispute this point.
The testimony of Mr. Knodell appears to describe White House decisions that were inconsistent with the directives of Executive Order 12958, which you signed in March 2003. Under this executive order, the White House is required to "take appropriate and prompt corrective action" whenever there is a release of classified information. Yet Mr. Knodell could describe no such actions after the disclosure of Ms. Wilson's identity.
Taken as a whole, the testimony at today's hearing described breach after breach of national security requirements at the White House. The first breach was the disclosure of Ms. Wilson's identity. Other breaches included the failure of Mr. Rove and other officials to report their disclosures as required by law, the failure of the White House to initiate the prompt investigation required by the executive order, and the failure of the White House to suspend the security clearances of the implicated officials.
To assist the Committee in its investigation into these issues, I request that you provide the Committee with a complete account of the steps that the White House took following the disclosure of Ms. Wilson's identity (1) to investigate how the leak occurred; (2) to review the security clearances of the White House officials implicated in the leak; (3) to impose administrative or disciplinary sanctions on the officials involved in the leak; and (4) to review and revise existing White House security procedures to prevent future breaches of national security.
I look forward to your response and hope you will cooperate with the Committee's inquiry.
Sincerely,
Henry A. Waxman
Chairman
cc: Tom Davis
Ranking Minority Member
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version
Buzz this on Buzzflash.net




Technorati Tags:
Wanting and Getting
Wanting answers from the White House and getting answers fromt he White House are two completely different things. Applauds to Waxman for going after the truth, but unfortunately the prez and his crooks are not going to do anything but delay, stall, blame someone that has departed, or just simply say that and internal investigation that is required by executive order would breach national security. The prez and his crooks will respond by saying "I am the decider and no one is going to tell me what to investigate and what not to investigate." In the war on terror it just seem that the greatest creator of the war is the one that is supposedly leading the war: the prez, rove, cheney, gates, rice, armitage, all need to be denied their habaes corpus as they have so quickly done others.
Waxman hearing
Subpoenaing Rove and documents is all well and good - and necessary - but where are Robert ("The Invisible Man") Novak and Richard ("I did it") Armitage in all of this?
Seems to me if anyone could shed light on the leaking (and leakers) of classified information, it would be they. Novak surely got some sort of deal from Fitzgereald, but that case is closed now. Armitage has made limited statements to the press. Let's have them both on the record and under oath before Waxman's committee, and get the full story.
full plate
I would imagine Waxman has a rather full plate to choose from.
I called Rep. Waqxman's office few days ago (every one should call) and asked if they'd consider hearings on the Sibel Edmonds case and they mentioned a heavy volume of calls were coming in to do so ... there's election fraud, wire-tapping, war-profiteering, and on and on ...
I'm just happy to finally see some smoke - now for the FIRE!!!
Henry Waxman for President
or at least give a few pints of blood to the pale, sick and anemic Democrats, (and maybe a few bone cells from his spine)...PLEASE
Lies
andrushka
I think it is high time that we take for granted that every member of the White House from top to bottom and their minions in the government are TOTALLY incapable of telling the truth.
They simply do not know how to.
The whole business seemed to
The whole business seemed to have Knodell stunned that his office would even be involved in an investigation. Then when he tried to explain who he reports to, it got embarrassing. When do we see those heads roll?
Rep. Waxman's points are well taken:
1. failure of Mr. Rove and other officials to report their disclosures as required by law,
2. the failure of the White House to initiate the prompt investigation required by the executive order,
3. and the failure of the White House to suspend the security clearances of the implicated officials.
The main point is that this IS about National Security, and they failed on all three counts.
They failed our intelligence services, they failed our intelligence operatives, and they failed our national security, in one fell swoop. And for what purpose? Manipulation to discredit political opponents.
Rove and Cheney still need to go.
it would seem so ...
but how many times have we said this already? When this first broke I was wondering why their security clearances weren't being pulled.
Their arrogance is breath-taking. Anyone with an I.Q. higher than a layer of dust can place what was said to what was done and see that these criminals just didn't care. You could almost hear them saying, "Investo'gations?! We don need na stink'n investo'gations!!!"
NOW! This SHOULD happen fast, hopefully. I can't see how anyone close to bush, including bush himself can justify being trusted with state secrets. One would think rove would be first to go, who knows ...?
... anyway, game on ...
Called Waxman's office
I called his office to say I wish Congessman Waxman was my Congressman instead of the colorless chickenhawk 18 year republican place holder Chris Shays of CT. I hope this is the beginning of a groundswell of representatives who care more about the constitution and the state of our democracy than the state of their re-election or their loyalty to party hacks and corporate toadies. Well, I can dream can't I?
High Duplicity
The dupilicity of this White House is stunning to behold. What could bush possibly say to defend himself for not conducting an internal investigation?
“… well, I know I said publicly that I wanted to get to the bottom of who in my White House may or may not have been part of this leak and fire anyone that had anything to do with it, and I ahh, well, ah … been busy ... terr’a … I was investigating , ah terr’a … busy … hard work … it’s hard work being president … if I took time out from protecting you on ah, can't take tim ... protecting you and your little babies and families from evil-doers … evil doers ... get to bottom of evil doers ... no time … gotta go”
. . . letter to Josh Bolton
Henry Waxman's efforts are to be applauded and encouraged to be ready for round 2 after the
decider decides not to tell why he decided to backtrack on his boast/promise to clean house if
it needed to be cleaned. Time for another spine check coming up.