Ex-Spy: Tortured al-Qaeda Captive Deliberately Misled U.S. into Iraq War to Topple Saddam, Launch Jihad. And Bush Bought it.
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
An al-Qaeda captive deliberately misled the U.S. into attacking Iraq, an ex-spy is claiming. Under the assumed name Omar Nasiri, the former double agent detailed last night on a BBC program and in a new book his infiltration of terrorist organizations over a decade and what he learned about their strategies.
It is already known that Ibn Sheikh al-Libi, who ran al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan, provided erroneous information after he was captured by American forces in late 2001 and sent to Egypt for interrogation and torture. Nasiri adds to the story with his contention that Libi intentionally lied to provoke the U.S. to invade Iraq in hopes of overthrowing Saddam and establishing Iraq as the center of a massive jihad.
Of course, the western intelligence organizations Nasiri claims to have worked for are obviously not commenting on their ties to him. But his credibility has been addressed positively by multiple media outlets covering his book and the interview, such as the Washington Post, the New York Times, CBS, the UK Guardian, and the BBC. "I’ve never seen anything from that period that was so complete and rang so true," said Michael Scheuer, who used to run the CIA unit that focused on Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda. "It really tied together and resonated with the information we had in classified form."
True or not, Nasiri's story is certainly very plausible and consistent with everything else we have heard about pre-war intelligence: the Bush Administration blindly accepted anything that justified war, regardless of veracity. It also reaffirms arguments against torture: in addition to being barbaric, uncivilized, and a danger to our own troops, torture also can provide wrong information. "(Libi) knew what his interrogators wanted, and he was happy to give it to them," Nasiri wrote. "He wanted to see Saddam toppled even more than the Americans did."
According to Nasiri, one of the most important parts of the training al-Qaeda recruits receive in training camps is how to supply false information during interrogation.
If anything Nasiri alleges is accurate, it would indicate a systematic failure of the Bush Administration to collect and interpret intelligence, and further debase their case for war. Kinda makes you wonder why Americans are not hearing anything about this in the news, doesn't it?
A BUZZFLASH NEWS ALERT
»
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version

123
On the other hand...
"the Bush Administration blindly accepted anything that justified war, regardless of veracity."
Are you sure about that?
How do you know that Bush/Cheney didn't already have a deal with these people before they gave us their erroneous information?
Through the Looking Glass
bush&co. remind me of Alice in Wonderland. If you just reverse everything you've been taught to be as common sense you would have bush, cheny, and the rest of their ilk.
It has always boggled my mind how anyone can not see right through this incredibly transparent gambit.
Screw-up, get a Metal of Freedom. Lies become truths. Take your freedom away to preserve it. Up is down. It's Orwell on steroids.
I pray that when investigations start that the outrage becomes deafening and any promise the Dems made to not impeach is reversed. For if there is anyone group that has ever held office that needs to be held accountable - it's this one!
My worst fear is that if bush begins to feel cornered it will be "bombs away" on Iran. I'd start to look for a "false flag" operation to provoke this happening. Say, one of our ships is sunk off the Iranian coast. (Oh, for those of you that don't know yet, 9/11 was an inside job too. Check it out at 9/11truth.org.)
Real reasons
It is hard to guess but two reasons come to mind as plausible. First, the shrub wanted to best daddy. Second, the shrub and his circle of campaign contributors and his family would gain billions of dollars.
I have to go with these reasons. WMD can't be true because Bush has done nothing to secure our borders from the invasion and Homeland Security is a government department that accomplishes absolutely nothing except spend still more of our money.
Two more questions
All of the articles on the prewar intelligence on Iraq beg the same two questions; if the reasons the Bush administration gave to justify the war weren’t their real reasons for the war then what was their real motivation? And why couldn’t they state publicly their real reason for the invasion of Iraq?